PARK: (Park “Opak”)
- artificial life
- too open
- distance
- safe space
- regulations and law makes it restricted zone, like space to barbeque or tables to play chests
- park closes at 9PM
- security
- too many functions, too strict form, no freedom
- one can see the street from the inside, not intimate, one can “feel the street”
- arbour full, park empty
- diverse
SQUARE (Plac Szembeka):
- dangerous (alcohol, fights)
- old people: badly done revitalisation, concrete, ugly
- young people: recreation, but not at night, meetings
- fountains bad idea, because of homeless people
- The church is not being seen, no one pays attention to the church building
- Low frequency?
- Crimes, fights
- Dynamic, “en passant” vs meeting point
- No public toilets
- Artisans
- Cultural Information Point (for the whole district)
- No green
ROUNDABOUT (Rondo Wiatraczna):
- Poor communications
- Not enough technology solutions
- Night shops (27/7)
- Wild market, “illegal space”
- Neglected infrastructure
- Transport, road and trams hub
- Not intuitive
- Paths
- Dangerous to pass from one point to another (passing the streets)
- Inaccessible for cyclists and trolleys, “not accommodated for wheels”
- No regular parking spots
- A lot of unexploited space
- Lost oasis in the middle of roundabout
- Nervous
- Alcoholics and homeless
- Unpleasant smell
- Unhealthy
- “Fear or paranoia?”
Overall:
1) Boarders: communication, infrastructure, day/night axis (safety), social acceptance
(drinking beer on a bench), being individual l& anonymous, no integrity, excluding some
of the groups
2) Barriers: safety, control/lack of the control
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz